Leadership Theory And Practice Of Leadership Essay

â€Å"Leadership is a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal† (Northouse, 2010, pg. 3). Leadership has engaged in many practices throughout time. Leadership has been given great importance within organizations, since this can be done based on leader’s styles, making people more productive. From its beginnings, leadership has always been focused on the leader, in the style it handles and theories under which it is recognized. As I reflect on the information that I have learned about â€Å"Leadership Theory and Practice† I find it extremely important to see the application in real life. Therefore, I considered Mrs. Magana, to interview and go further with my curiosities about her leadership style. She has made a great impact through her path as a leader here in Fort Worth ISD. Mrs. Magana’s greatest assets are the followers that she has been given the pleasure of leading. She always will be the first to tell you that, without dedicated and committed team members who enthusiastically choose to follow, they can accomplish little. She also tells you that the best investment is the time she spent with her team members, time spent in learning about each team member s wants and needs, time learning about each team member s values and priorities. She uses this information to help each individual grow, she prioritizes each individual s talents so that they are given the opportunity to excel and advance. Knowing this, I was inspired toShow MoreRelatedLeadership Theory And Practice Of Leadership874 Words   |  4 Pageswhatever topic or approach to leadership Peter Northouse (2013) was discussing in his book Leadership Theory and Practice. Each one of these self-assessments were intended to help me in discovering who I was as a person and a leader. Some of the leadership self-assessments included the Least Preferred Coworker Measure from the Contingency Theory chapter, the Leader-Member Exchan ge Questionnaire from the Leader-Member Exchange Theory chapter, and the Servant Leadership Questionnaire from the chapterRead MoreThe Leadership Theory And Practice1170 Words   |  5 PagesLeadership Theory and Practice Review of Subject Throughout the history of law enforcement, leaders have used many different styles to lead employees. From the early styles of Autocratic and Laissez-Faire to Participative (democratic), Transactional and Transformational leadership. Leadership within policing has evolved over the years in some organizations to a more participative style and yet there are still leaders who cling to an antiquated domineering style. Nothing is further fromRead MoreLeadership : Theory And Practice1231 Words   |  5 PagesNorthouse s, Leadership: Theory and Practice, provides several major theories and models of leadership within the text. It presents in-depth theories of leadership and how it applies to real life situations. Northouse believed that the four essential components of leadership that he identified as leadership is a process, involves influence, occurs in groups, and involves common goals. Thus, he defines leadership as a process that occurs in groups which involve influence, and common goals. The bookRead MoreThe Leadership : Theory And Practice772 Words   |  4 Pages Wk8AssgnJLayman: The Leadership Archetype Approach Questionnaire Walden University Ph.D. Public Policy and Administration â€Æ' Introduction This is an introduction to the Leadership Archetype Questionnaire (Kets de Vries, 2006b), introduced in Chapter 12 of the textbook â€Å"Leadership: Theory and Practice† by Peter Northouse (Northouse, 2016). The Leadership Archetype Questionnaire gauges a leader’s perception of his/her style of leadership by identifying the key leadership behaviors they displayRead MoreLeadership : Theory And Practice1795 Words   |  8 PagesA man that reflects most of the leadership qualities of a leader just so happened to be someone that lives and works locally here in Texas. He is from La Marque Texas and came from a very humble background not too far from where he works today. Looking back no one would have guess that this young boy would grow up and become such a prominent figure in Galveston county and abroad. Nobody that is except for he and myself. A Look into The Life of a Local Leader by There was always something aboutRead MoreThe Theory Of The Leadership Practice1279 Words   |  6 PagesThe leadership practice I exhibit the most is the ‘Challenge the Process’. I am always searching for rne opportunities by taking the initiative and looking outward for innovative ways to improve. I enjoy experimenting and taking risks by constantly generating small wins and learning from experience. I like to be a role model that not only leads, but follows. The five behaviors exhibit the most frequently include searching outside the organization for innovative ways to improve from the encourageRead MoreTeam Leadership Theory And Practice1472 Words   |  6 PagesOthers For Team Excellence Michelle Kinyungu Kaplan University GM503-02: Leadership Theory and Practice II Dr. Lisa Bardill Moscaritolo April 27, 2016 Introduction The topics discussed by Northouse, Kouzes, and Posner are team leadership. Team leadership are work units that have are interdependent and share common goals (Northouse,2016). In this week?s unit, team leadership will be explained through the Hill Model for Team Leadership and how it applies to team effectiveness. Furthermore, virtual andRead MoreSelf Leadership Theories And Practices2363 Words   |  10 PagesSelf-leadership Theories and Practices A Thesis Presented by Edward Sun to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Technological Systems Management (Concentration – optional) Stony Brook University May 2015 â€Æ' Stony Brook University The Graduate School Edward Sun We, the thesis committee for the above candidate for the Master of Science degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this thesis. William Name – Second Reader Include titleRead MoreThe Leadership Theory And Practice Book1264 Words   |  6 Pagesfor a definition of leadership pulls up a plethora of results, each definition slightly different from the last. The readings from the Leadership: Theory and Practice book also draw attention to the multitude of descriptions of leadership as well as the strengths, weaknesses and practical implications for several different leadership approaches. Specifically, trait, skills, style and situational. This paper will outline the implications of each of these models for my leadership profile and will alsoRead MoreLeaderships Leadership Theory And Practice999 Words   |  4 PagesTech University Health Sciences Center Leadership Self-Assessment Leaders come in all different shapes and sizes. Determining the kind of leader one will be most successful and best received by his peers can be challenging. After reviewing Northouse’s Leadership Theory and Practice, I have selected two different leadership styles that I believe will help me utilize my best attributes as a nursing leader. Transformational leadership was selected for the qualities of helping change and

Arguments behind ethical relativism - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 560 Downloads: 5 Date added: 2019/10/10 Did you like this example? The discussions presented by James Rachel on the issue of cultural relativity and the ethical relativity is the premise that different cultures have different moral codes that guide given actions of individuals. In that sense, variations in the morality from one culture to another provides space to assert that right or wrong is a matter of the personal opinions which is then a subjective issue on different cultures. An illustrative example given by Rachel is a case of one culture viewing cannibalism as a standard dynamic in the society while the next culture frowns upon acts of cannibalism and therefore making right or wrong a varying opinion from cultures to cultures. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Arguments behind ethical relativism" essay for you Create order In trying to understand the different moral epistemology theory mentioned and the ontological summarization in the discussions by Rachel, results in an argument about cultural or ethical relativism is that full of fallacy. Another illustration on the premise that different cultures have to defer moral codes is the general assumption by many that the earth is flat yet in actual proven scientific senses it is spherical. The divergent opinions on the actual shape of the earth and belief in either of the arguments do not disqualify the other argument only because one does not agree with the perceptions of the other. Given the stated positions of different moral views about certain circumstances in the society regarding morals, we, therefore, lack stable and contingent reasons to believe that ethical relativism is a real school of thought. On the contrary, to above analogies by Rachel, there are certain grounds to argue that theory of ethical relativism is wrong. The first reasoning behind Rachel’s arguments against the theory of ethical relativism is the fact that we cannot stand up and claim that our cultures and perceptions are morally upright and superior to those of others who don’t share the same ideologies with us.   The historical acts committed by other communities like the German Nazi, however, stand to be criticized whichever logic they used to orchestrate such injustices, and hence it becomes morally plausible to say that ethical relativism is a false concept. Another argument against cultural relativism is that to hold the theory it then casts a shadow of the doubt to the ideals of moral progress through cultural transitions by integrating other cultures and adapting them as part of the moral grounds on which people’s actions can be held to merit. The strength of the arguments on different morals of various cultures and it is a matter of personal opinions is the appeal to have tolerance to individual morals held by some cultures. An important argument in that regard of tolerance is the ability to speak the truth against opposite injustices like was done against Nazi Germany. As it is put by some saint ‘in all non-essential things, respect for diversity. In essential things, unity. In all things love’. In the same vein, the non-consensual bride kidnapping as common in some cultures requires unity against because that is morally implausible. Ethical responsibility is the function of knowledge and enlightenment and hence those trapped in ignorance of harmful cultures and morals approved by people of their ilk but frowned upon by others like the non-consensual bridal kidnapping. Lack of blame among those who approve such acts still warrants condemnation from those that morally feel that such actions are wrong.

Knights Tale Essay Free Essays

Anthony Slaughter 10/27/11 The Knight’s Tale Essay In the beginning of the movie Will is just a peasant, squire but by the end of the movie, upon finding his newfound talent of jousting, he transformed is his social status from peasant to royalty by becoming a knight. In the beginning of the movie, The Knight’s Tale, William Thatcher and his two friends, Wat and Roland, start off as three ordinary squires. Right before a jousting match their knight that they serve dies; with their knight dead there is no one else of royalty to ride in his place. We will write a custom essay sample on Knights Tale Essay or any similar topic only for you Order Now However, with the threat of forfeiting approaching, William decides to ride in his knight’s place, risking being caught and put to prison or worse. Once Will was done getting ready for the joust, it was time to see what he could do and to the surprise of Will, Wat, and Roland he had won the joust. After winning, they received prize money in which they divided up among themselves. Wat and Roland wanted take their share of money and go to the bar, but Will had other plans. Will convinced them to put all their money together and train him to become a better jouster. Wat and Roland agreed and they began to train Will; after a while of training and practicing Will got it down, yet the one thing he didn’t have was documentation that he was born of royalty, which was the only qualification of becoming a knight. Luckily, one day while traveling they came across a man named Geoffrey Chaucer, he was a writer/scribe who had a gambling problem and because of his problem he had lost his cloths and was completely naked on the road. Chaucer promised to create documentation for Will, if Will clothed, fed, shoed, and let him travel with them. Will agreed and all four of them were off to their first jousting tournament. At Wills first tournament, he competed in joust and in sword fighting. Also at this tournament he saw a beautiful woman who peeked his interest, her name was Joseline. Will jousted first and did very well until he faced the cocky and undefeated, Count Adhemar who had mocked him and made him look like a fool in front of Joseline. Will competed in swords next, winning first prize in the competition, but Will was not happy because all he wanted to do was beat Adhemar in jousting, which meant Will had to invest all his time into jousting to have a chance to meet Adhemar in the jousting championships. With his goal in sight, Will began winning all the tournaments he competed in, making his name known throughout Europe. His new armor forged and crafted by the women blacksmith, Kate, who now traveled with them, helped him win his tournaments because of its lightness and strength. Joseline also noticed Will, not because of the fame he had earned but because of her unannounced love for him and invited him to a dance after one of his wins, and their love for each other grew from there. Because of Will’s success he was able to move on to the championships, which took place in his hometown. While in his hometown, Will searched and located his father, John Thatcher who he had not seen in 12 years. Unfortunately, Adhemar watched Will try to sneak out. That next day, before the joust with his adversary, Adhemar, Will was arrested for using fake documentation that said that he was born of royal blood. However, Prince Edward, who had great respect for Will because Will didn’t forfeit the jousting match to him just because he was the Prince, was in the crowd with his personal bodyguard. Prince Edward said that Will was a descendant of ancient royalty, freeing Will. The Prince then knighted Will, enabling him to compete in his jousting championship match between Adhemar. When the match started, Will jumped to a quick lead, Adhemar didn’t like that so he decided to use a lance with a solid, metal tip to intentionally hurt Will†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. Characterization is the process by which the writer reveals the personality of a character. There are two ways the author can reveal characterization, direct characterization and indirect characterization. Direct Characterization tells the audience what the personality of the character is. Indirect Characterization shows things that reveal the personality of a character. In the movie the author uses indirect characterization by describing Will’s personality through his actions and choices he makes throughout the movie. One example is at the end, when Will still goes out to joust Adhemar, instead of trying to run away, even though he knows he will most likely get arrested. Will’s act in this situation showed his heart, determination, and relentlessness to complete his goal of defeating Adhemar. Will’s personality led him to follow morals such as bravery, determination, respect, and chivalry. Through these morals Will learned some lessons. Will learned the chivalry of a knight, when jousting Prince Edward, he learned respect when he fell in love with Joseline. Through these lessons he became a noble and honorable man, far different than the peasant life he once lived. How to cite Knights Tale Essay, Essays

Criminal Law. R V Blaue free essay sample

The defendant inflicted serious stab wounds on the deceased who, knowing she would be likely to die as a result, refused a blood transfusion because she was a Jehovahs Witness and accepting anothers blood was against her religion. The defendant claimed that her refusal to accept the blood transfusion broke the chain of causation between his conduct and her death. Extract There have been two cases in recent years which have some bearing on this topic: R v Jordan and R v Smith. In R v Jordan the Court of Criminal Appeal, after conviction, admitted some medical evidence which went to prove that the cause of death was not the blow relied on by the prosecution but abnormal medical treatment after admission to hospital. This case has been criticised but it was probably rightly decided on its facts. Before the abnormal treatment started the injury had almost healed. We share Lord Parker CJs opinion ([1959] 2 All ER at 198, [1959] 2 QB at 43) that R v Jordan should be regarded as a case decided on its own special facts and not as an authority relaxing the common law approach to causation. We will write a custom essay sample on Criminal Law. R V Blaue or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Only if it can be said that the original wounding is merely the setting in which another cause operates can it be said that the death does not result from the wound. Putting it in another way, only if the second cause is so overwhelming as to make the original wound merely part of the history can it be said that death does not flow from the wound. The physical cause of death in [the instant] case was the bleeding into the pleural cavity arising from the penetration of the lung. This had not been brought about by any decision made by the deceased girl but by the stab wound. Counsel for the appellant tried to overcome this line of reasoning by submitting that the jury should have been directed that if they thought the girls decision not to have a blood transfusion was an unreasonable one, then the chain of causation would have been broken. At once the question arises reasonable by whose standards? Those of Jehovahs Witnesses? Humanists? Roman Catholics? Protestants of Anglo-Saxon descent? The man on the Clapham omnibus? But he might well be an admirer of Eleazar who suffered death rather than eat the flesh of swinef or of Sir Thomas Moore who, unlike nearly all his contemporaries, was unwilling to accept Henry VIII as Head of the Church in England. Those brought up in the Hebraic and Christian traditions would probably be reluctant to accept that these martyrs caused their own deaths. As was pointed out to counsel for the appellant in the course of argument, two cases, each raising the same issue of reasonableness because of religious beliefs, could produce different verdicts depending on where the cases were tried. A jury drawn from Preston, sometimes said to be the most Catholic town in England, might have different views about martyrdom to one drawn from the inner suburbs of London. Counsel for the appellant accepted that this might be so; it was, he said, inherent in trial by jury. It is not inherent in the common law as expounded by Sir Matthew Hale and Maule J. It has long been the policy of the law that those who use violence on other people must take their victims as they find them. This in our judgment means the whole man, not just the physical man. It does not lie in the mouth of the assailant to say that his victims religious beliefs which inhibited him from accepting certain kinds of treatment were unreasonable. The question for decision is what caused her death. The answer is the stab wound. The fact that the victim refused to stop this end coming about did not break the causal connection between the act and death. If a victims personal representatives claim compensation for his death the concept of foreseeability can operate in favour of the wrongdoer in the ssessment of such compensation; the wrong doer is entitled to expect his victim to mitigate his damage by accepting treatment of a normal kind: see Steele v R George amp; Co Ltd. As counsel for the Crown pointed out, the criminal law is concerned with the maintenance of law and order and the protection of the public generally. A policy of the common law applicable to the settlement of tortious liability between subjects may not be, and in our judgment is not, appropriat e for the criminal law. The issue of the cause of death in a trial for either murder or manslaughter is one of fact for the jury to decide. But if, as in this case, there is no conflict of evidence and all the jury has to do is to apply the law to the admitted facts, the judge is entitled to tell the jury what the result of that application will be. In this case the judge would have been entitled to have told the jury that the appellants stab wound was an operative cause of death.